Peer Review Process
Dear authors!
The materials you submit are evaluated by the editors and publisher comprehensively and impartially before publication.
The publication is based on the understanding that a scientific article is a holistic scientific research work and contains elements inherent in such work (a literature review, definition of the research goal and tasks for its achievement, a review of methods, experiments and their analysis, conclusions, etc.).
The drafts of the submitted manuscripts must be presented in compliance with the structure of a logical and consistent presentation of thoughts, its content is structured and proves the significance of the applicant's scientific contribution to science in the form of a finished work.
Moreover, the publishing house does not have the opportunity to distribute materials containing any information about violence against living/inanimate nature, the consequences of such actions, their discussion, etc.
The presentation of such content may cause moral harm to certain categories of readers and will not be accepted for publication. The publication also does not accept materials with illustrations of animal or human bodies for the purpose of disseminating scientific medical knowledge about surgical interventions in organisms. Such illustrations can also harm readers.
Please refrain from any information that may harm readers.
The publishing house does not accept materials with illustrations whose authorship does not belong to the authors/author of the work, or such authorship has not been proven. Works containing photographic prints of persons who can be identified from the photo data are also not accepted for publication.
Manuscripts indicating the surname or other information that identifies a specific person are not accepted.
Manuscripts containing references to institutions, organizations or associations are not accepted.
In the event of rejection of the material from publication and publication, the editorial office rejects the materials without going into detail about the reasons.
The publishing house of the journal practices single blind peer review after review by the editors. After the appropriate decision of the editors, the manuscript is submitted for expert evaluation to the appropriate reviewer. The reviewer's comments are forwarded to the authors along with a possible recommendation for revision of the manuscript. The editor notifies the authors whether the manuscript is accepted as not requiring revision, or the authors are given the opportunity to revise the manuscript and submit it again, or the manuscript is rejected.
Average time for reviewing manuscripts: 5 days-10 days.
All articles submitted for publication are reviewed. The editors of the magazine determine the compliance of the articles of the magazine profile with the design requirements and send them to a specialist for review. Reviewing takes place according to a blind scheme. All correspondence between the reviewers and the author is conducted through the editorial office. If necessary, the manuscript can be sent for review to other reviewers additionally.
Review procedure:
- All submitted articles are registered at the time of manuscript submission in electronic form.
- The editors of the collection decide on the selection of reviewers for a given manuscript according to its topic, or the manuscript is rejected as not corresponding to the topic of the collection.
- Manuscript materials are submitted for review to designated reviewers. The result of the review is the reviewer's recommendation.
— In the case of a positive review, the manuscript is submitted to the editors for its preparation for publication.
— If it is necessary to revise the manuscript, a review is sent to the author along with all the comments and wishes of the reviewer.
— In the case of a negative review of the manuscript, the review with a refusal is sent to the author.
- After receiving the review results, the author prepares the necessary materials.
— In case of the need to revise the manuscript - prepares a revised version of the manuscript. The revised version of the manuscript is sent for re-review.
- A manuscript that has received a positive review is approved for publication by the editor and sent to the editorial office for further preparation for publication.
In addition to the speed with which information can be communicated to the research community, post-publication review (PPR) also has the potential advantage of facilitating dynamic discussion among researchers and eliciting input from a wider range of participants. Although pre-publication review is still considered best, the benefits of post-publication review are becoming equally recognized. Post-publication peer review can facilitate the dissemination of a manuscript, facilitate meaningful discussions and collaboration between researchers, and be an effective open science solution. Remarks, comments and suggestions for improving the manuscript can be sent to the editors for further transmission to the authors of the article.
The editors use eTXT Antiplagiarism.