Climate change and the use of metaphors in public narratives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjel.20250403.08

Keywords:

climate change, public discourse, metaphor analysis, conceptual metaphor theory, Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP)

Abstract

This study investigates the role of metaphorical framing in public climate discourse and its influence on public understanding, emotional engagement, and policy orientation. Using the Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP), the research analyzes a corpus of media articles, institutional reports, and policy documents to identify and classify dominant conceptual metaphors, such as “climate as a threat,” “adaptive response,” “economic investment,” and “health risk”, etc. The findings show that metaphors serve not only as stylistic devices but as powerful cognitive and rhetorical tools that simplify complex environmental processes, evoke emotional responses, and strengthen ideological positions. The most frequent models – “threat/crisis” and “adaptive response” – reflect the tension between urgency and resilience in contemporary climate communication. Less common metaphors, such as “structural weakening” or “geographical shift,” highlight systemic vulnerabilities and may become more prominent in future climate justice discussions. The paper also explores how different metaphor models resonate emotionally and ideologically, depending on the context and audience. It suggests that certain metaphors may inspire proactive behavior, while others risk causing fear or apathy. By comparing metaphor usage across genres, the study emphasizes the need for customized communication approaches that suit the specific needs and characteristics of different audiences. The research concludes that carefully chosen, context-specific metaphors can improve the clarity and effectiveness of climate messaging across scientific, political, and media domains. Recommendations are made for responsible metaphor use in policymaking, education, and journalism to support more inclusive discourse on climate adaptation and sustainability.

References

Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2017). Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication, 11(6), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111

Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N. (2009). Compounds, creativity and complexity in climate change communication: The case of “carbon indulgences.” Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 345–353.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.03.001

Nerlich, B., & Hellsten, I. (2014). The greenhouse metaphor and the footprint metaphor: Climate change risk assessment and risk management seen through the lens of two prominent metaphors. TATuP Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis, 23(2), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.23.2.27

Deignan, A. (2017). Metaphors in texts about climate change. Ibérica, 34, 45–65. Retrieved from: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=287053467003

Atanasova, D., & Koteyko, N. (2017). Metaphors in Guardian Online and Mail Online opinion coverage of climate change. Environmental Communication, 11(4), 452-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705

Hel, S., I.Hellsten, & Steen, G. (2018). Tipping points and climate change: Metaphor between science and the media. Environmental Communication, 12(2), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1410198

O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear won't do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201

Nerlich, B., & Jaspal, R. (2012). Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(2), 131–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2012.665795

Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. (2016). Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12096

Fløttum, K. (2017). The role of language in the climate change debate. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456935

Asplund, T. (2011). Metaphors in climate discourse: An analysis of Swedish farm magazines. Journal of Science Communication, 10 (4). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.10040201

Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press

World Health Organization. (2024, May 28). WHO General Programme of Work 2025–2028 prioritizes climate change and health. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2024-who-general-programme-of-work-2025-2028-prioritizes-climate-change-and-health

Inter-American Development Bank. (2021). Climate change action plan 2021–2025. Retrieved from: https://publications.iadb.org/en/inter-american-development-bank-group-climate-change-action-plan-2021-2025

Morton, A., & Stock, P. (2024, November 28). Six things we learned about the Australian government's response to the climate crisis. The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/nov/28/six-things-we-learned-about-the-australian-governments-climate-policies

Arasu, S. (2025, March 19). Last decade was Earth’s hottest ever as CO2 levels reach an 800,000-year high, says UN report. AP News. Retrieved from: https://apnews.com/article/climate-change-united-nations-bb8e475cdaa3b3fb348f88276837d50e

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2025, April 2). Climate change impacts. Retrieved from: https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/climate/climate-change-impacts

Tempus, A. (2025, February 26). There were never any climate havens: Floods in the Midwest, hurricanes in Appalachia. The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/26/there-are-no-climate-havens

Downloads

Published

2025-06-01

How to Cite

Myroniuk, T. (2025). Climate change and the use of metaphors in public narratives. International Science Journal of Education & Linguistics, 4(3), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjel.20250403.08