AI as a tool for the student in PBL and modeling – empirical validation of a didactic model for active ai learning in technological education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjel.20260503.04

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, project-based learning, STEM education, Internet of Things, machine learning, didactic model, technological education, AI as a tool, learning with AI, pilot implementation, PBL

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into secondary education is increasingly emerging as a strategic priority, but existing approaches often focus on theoretical knowledge about AI rather than its active application. The model – "AI as a Tool for the Student (PBL and Modeling)" – has been described in a collective monograph as a theoretical didactic framework. The present article presents it not as a repetition but as an enhancement with empirical value. Here, the model is not only described but also tested, implemented, and evaluated in a real school environment. It transforms AI from an automation tool into an instrument for competency acquisition in symbiosis with the STEM approach. The model is operationalized through four sequential phases: problem definition, data collection, AI analysis, and modeling/solution. Methodological guidelines for implementation are derived from a pilot study conducted at the Varna Maritime High School "Saint Nicholas the Wonderworker" (VMG) , within the subject "Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence" for students majoring in Computer Hardware and Technologies. The pilot implementation integrated IoT sensors for temperature and humidity (ESP8266 with DHT22, Unihiker K10) with a MIND Link connection to an AI model. Results from 48 participating students (12 teams) showed an average ML model accuracy of 87%, 94% student engagement, and a 62% self-reported improvement in applied AI skills (paired t-test, p < 0.001). The article concludes that the model is not only theoretically described but has now been empirically validated. It successfully develops applied AI competencies, stimulates critical thinking, and prepares students for professional careers in AI, IoT, and data science. These results have been achieved provided that systematic teacher training and institutional support are ensured.

References

References:

Георгиев, Г. М. (2026). Интегриране на изкуствения интелект в професионалното образование чрез STEM подходи. Шумен: Университетско издателство "Епископ Константин Преславски"; 2026. стр. 196; ISBN 978-619-201-911-2 (print), ISBN: 978-619-201-912-9 (e-book).

Георгиев, Г. М. (2026). Организация на смесено обучение в професионалното образование чрез метода на обърнатата класна стая в Moodle. Шумен: Университетско издателство "Епископ Константин Преславски"; 2026. стр. 238; ISBN 978-619-201-914-3 (print), ISBN: 978-619-201-913-6 (e-book). .

Иванов, Н. (2026). Модел на циклична конвергенция "STEM - READY" за повишаване на ефективността на професионалното образование в STEM среда. 11-та Международна научно-практическа конференция „Дигитализация и устойчиво развитие: от технологии към общество“; Флоренция: ISG. DOI:10.46299/ISG.2026.1.11; URL: https://isg-konf.com/digitalization-and-sustainable-development-from-technology-to-society/

Mihalev, G. et al. Analysis of the implicit opportunities for ai integration in technological education in bulgaria. The modern paradigm of humanities education: philological and pedagogical aspects, from theory to educational practices and interdisciplinary research. Boston : International Science Group. – Boston: Primedia eLaunch, 2026; ISBN – 979-8-90214-601-8; in press.

Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019). Envisioning AI for K-12: What should every child know about AI? Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(01), 9795–9799.

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 703–732). New York: Wiley.

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.

Carney, M., Webster, G., Alvarado, I., Phillips, K., Howell, N., Griffith, J., ... & Chen, A. (2020). Teachable machine: Image-based Google AI experiments. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1265–1266).

Vahrenhold, J., Nardelli, E., & Magenheim, J. (2021). Machine learning for high school students. Informatics in Education, 20(3), 451–472.

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.

Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 29–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Виготски, Л. (1983). Мислене и реч. София: Наука и изкуство.

Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and making in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors (pp. 203-222). Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers.

Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2014). Connected code: Why children need to learn programming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., ... & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60-67.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. London: Pearson.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Georgiev, G. (2026). AI as a tool for the student in PBL and modeling – empirical validation of a didactic model for active ai learning in technological education. International Science Journal of Education & Linguistics, 5(3), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjel.20260503.04

Issue

Section

Theory, practice and methods of education