Theoretical and methodological approaches to designing integrated mathematics and computer science lessons

Authors

  • Ruslana Kolisnyk Department of Algebra and Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-7760
  • Ivan Zhytariuk Department of Algebra and Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-6312
  • Viktoriia Luchko Department of Algebra and Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2388-7711

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjel.20260504.02

Keywords:

integrated learning, Mathematics, Computer Science, integrated lesson design, structural-functional model, digital competence, STEM education, competency-based approach

Abstract

This article examines theoretical and methodological approaches to designing integrated Mathematics and Computer Science lessons within the framework of the competency-based educational paradigm and the digital transformation of the educational process. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to improve teaching methodology through the integration of subject content, which contributes to the development of students' key and subject-specific competencies, critical thinking, research skills, and the ability to apply acquired knowledge to solving practical problems. The purpose of the study is to provide a theoretical justification for and develop a structural-functional model for designing integrated Mathematics and Computer Science lessons, as well as to identify the pedagogical conditions necessary for its effective implementation. To achieve this purpose, a set of theoretical research methods was employed, including analysis, synthesis, generalization, systematization of scientific sources, comparison of contemporary pedagogical concepts, and modelling. The paper analyzes current approaches to integrated learning, STEM education, the use of digital technologies, as well as activity-based, competency-based, and project-based approaches to teaching. The authors propose an original structural-functional model for designing integrated lessons, which comprises the following components: goal-oriented, conceptual-methodological, content-related, organizational-technological, activity-processual, and result-evaluation. An algorithm for designing integrated lessons has been developed, and the pedagogical conditions for their effective implementation have been identified. These conditions include the purposeful selection of educational content, teaching methods, digital tools, and forms of organizing learning activities. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the substantiation of the proposed structural-functional model for designing integrated Mathematics and Computer Science lessons and in identifying the interrelationships among its components. The practical significance of the findings lies in the possibility of applying the proposed model by teachers of general secondary education institutions when planning integrated lessons, STEM projects, and educational research activities, as well as in improving the methodology of teaching Mathematics and Computer Science.

References

Список літератури:

Бібік Н.М. (2015). Переваги і ризики запровадження компетентнісного підходу в шкільній освіті. Український педагогічний журнал. 1. 47–58. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/9772/1/10-35-1-PB%20%281%29.pdf

Биков В.Ю. (2019). Цифрова трансформація суспільства і розвиток комп’ютерно-технологічної платформи освіти і науки України. Інформаційно-цифровий освітній простір України: трансформаційні процеси і перспективи розвитку: матеріали методологічного семінару НАПН України. Київ, 2019. 20–26. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/718692/

Жалдак, М.І., Лапінський, В.В., Шут, М.І. (2004). Комп’ютерно-орієнтовані засоби навчання математики, фізики, інформатики: посібник для вчителів. НПУ імені М. П. Драгоманова, 182.

Морзе Н.В., Вембер В.П., Гладун М.А. (2019). 3D картування цифрової компетентності в системі освіти України. Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання. 70(2). 28–42. https://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/2994/1480.pdf

Спірін О.М. (2007).Теоретичні та методичні засади професійної підготовки майбутніх учителів інформатики за кредитно-модульною системою: монографія. Житомир: ЖДУ ім. І. Франка, 300. https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/459/

Пометун О.І., Пироженко Л.В. (2011). Сучасний урок та інтерактивні технології навчання: наук.-метод. посіб. Київ: А.С.К., 192. https://files.znu.edu.ua/files/Bibliobooks/Inshi73/0054143.pdf

Кабінет Міністрів України. (2020). Про деякі питання державних стандартів повної загальної середньої освіти (Постанова № 898, 30 вересня). Верховна Рада України. Законодавство України. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/898-2020-%D0%BF

Кабінет Міністрів України. (2020). Концепція розвитку природничо-математичної освіти (STEM-освіти) (Розпорядження № 960-р, 5 серпня). Міністерство освіти і науки України. rada.gov.ua

Bybee, R.W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. NSTA Press, 130.

Kelley, T.R., Knowles, J.G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, Article 11, 1–11. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.pdf

Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49 (3), 33–35. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~15110-s13/Wing06-ct.pdf

Thomas, J.W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. Autodesk Foundation, 46. http://www.bobpearlman.org/BestPractices/PBL_Research.pdf

Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House, 83 (2), 39–43. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00098650903505415

Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity through Passion, Projects, and Peers. MIT Press, 208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11017.001.0001

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29 (2), 109–121. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/25532044/TPACK_in_teacher_education.pdf

OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030. OECD Publishing, 23 https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/concept-notes/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_concept_note.pdf

European Commission. (2020). Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027: Resetting education and training for the digital age. European Commission, 32. https://education.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document-library-docs/deap-communication-sept2020_en.pdf

UNESCO. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development. UNESCO, 44. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994.pdf

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge, 378. https://inspirasifoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/John-Hattie-Visible-Learning_-A-synthesis-of-over-800-meta-analyses-relating-to-achieveme

Published

2026-08-01

How to Cite

Kolisnyk, R., Zhytariuk, I., & Luchko, V. (2026). Theoretical and methodological approaches to designing integrated mathematics and computer science lessons. International Science Journal of Education & Linguistics, 5(4), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjel.20260504.02

Issue

Section

Theory, practice and methods of education