Peer Review Process

Dear authors!

The materials you submit are evaluated by the editors and publisher comprehensively and impartially before publication.

The publication is based on the understanding that a scientific article is a holistic scientific research work and contains elements inherent in such work (a literature review, definition of the research goal and tasks for its achievement, a review of methods, experiments and their analysis, conclusions, etc.).

The drafts of the submitted manuscripts must be presented in compliance with the structure of a logical and consistent presentation of thoughts, its content is structured and proves the significance of the applicant's scientific contribution to science in the form of a finished work.

Moreover, the publishing house does not have the opportunity to distribute materials containing any information about violence against living/inanimate nature, the consequences of such actions, their discussion, etc.

The presentation of such content may cause moral harm to certain categories of readers and will not be accepted for publication. The publication also does not accept materials with illustrations of animal or human bodies for the purpose of disseminating scientific medical knowledge about surgical interventions in organisms. Such illustrations can also harm readers.

Please refrain from any information that may harm readers.

The publishing house does not accept materials with illustrations whose authorship does not belong to the authors/author of the work, or such authorship has not been proven. Works containing photographic prints of persons who can be identified from the photo data are also not accepted for publication.

Manuscripts indicating the surname or other information that identifies a specific person are not accepted.

Manuscripts containing references to institutions, organizations or associations are not accepted.

In the event of rejection of the material from publication and publication, the editorial office rejects the materials without going into detail about the reasons.

The publishing house of the journal practices single blind peer review after consideration by editors.  After the appropriate decision of the editors, the manuscript is submitted for expert evaluation to the relevant reviewer. The reviewer's comments are sent to the authors along with a possible recommendation to review the manuscript. The editor informs the authors whether the manuscript has been accepted as not requiring revision, or whether the authors are given the opportunity to rework the manuscript and submit it again, or whether the manuscript is rejected.