Freedom of information laws and open government data as anti-corruption measures

Authors

  • Ivalina Svetli Marinova Institute for the State and Law, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjjp.20230202.01

Keywords:

corruption phenomenon, access to public information, Freedom of information laws, open data, measures against corruption

Abstract

The phenomenon of corruption can be cited as a problem of social development – economic, political and social, in most of the counties in the world.

The corruption is concerned with the lack of democracy and can lead to unequal distribution of power and resources, lack of accountability, weak institutions and mismanagement. The purpose of the article is to analyze the importance of access to information laws and open data in the field of fighting corruption. The author argues his point of view, thе access to public information is a basic value in a democratic society and a prerequisite for the right of citizens to reasonably express an opinion and disseminate it. The general scientific research methods applied in the article are: analysis and synthesis methods, methods of systematic research, inductive and deductive methods, comparative analysis, comparative-legal method and systematic interpretation. The study showed that in order to defend our guaranteed human and civil rights, we must, strive not to turn a blind eye to corruption, but to look for possible ways of counteraction and prevention. By joining forces in this direction, members of society can support democracy, protect their human rights and, just as importantly, protect the moral foundations of society.

References

The fight against corruption: A priority for the Council of Europe. <https://www.coe.int/en/web/greco/about-greco/priority-for-the-coe> (Access 12, Aug. 2022).

Post-conflict Corruption: A Rule of Law Agenda? https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Post-conflict-Corruption%3A-A-Rule-of-Law-Agenda-for-Oakeshott-Amado/0e0c6371f286df9e8efd3ad27c1f0056d9dc94ee (Access 2, October 2022).

Fisman, R., Svensson, J. (2007). Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. J. of Development Economics, 83, (1), 63-75.

Billger, Sh. & Goel, R. (2009). Do existing corruption levels matter in controlling corruption?: Cross-country quantile regression estimates. J. of Development Economics, 90 (2), 299 – 305.

Brademas, J. & Heimann, Fr. (1998). Tackling International Corruption: No Longer Taboo. J. Foreign Affairs, 77 (5), 17-22.

Heywood, P. (2020). A political approach to corruption (pp. 27-40). In: Mungiu-Pippidi, A. & Heywood, P. (Eds.). A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

Джумалиева, А. (2020). Последици от корупцията за сигурността и управлението на демократичната държава (с. 472-485). В: Социологията на правото и съвременните насоки в развитието на правното познание. София: ИДП-БАН. ISBN- 978-619-91563-8-4.

Йонкова, Н. (2012). Когато патологията стане норма. Социология и икономика, 1, 44-56.

The perceived levels of public sector corruption in European Union - <https://www.transparency.org/en/news/cpi-2021-western-europe-european-union-trouble-ahead-for-stagnating-region> - (Access 06, May 2022).

Антикорупционни институции: нулева година. <https://acf.bg/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/ACF_Report_BG_2022_interactive-2.pdf > - (Access 08, February 2023).

Bak, Mathias (2021). Best practices in devolution and decentralization programs that may reduce corruption. <https://www.u4.no/publications/best-practices-in-devolution-and-decentralisation-programmes-that-may-reduce-corruption.pdf> - (Access 12 January 2023).

Sommermann, KP. (2021). Constitutional State and Public Administration. In: Kuhlmann, S., Proeller, I., Schimanke, D., Ziekow, J. (Еds.). Public Administration in Germany. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_2.

Blanke, HJ., Perlingeiro, R. (Eds.). (2018). The Right of Access to Public Information: An International Comparative Legal Survey. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN: 9783662555521.

Георгиева, К. (2019). Връзка на отворените данни с електронното управление. Норма, 3, 41-54. ISSN 1314-5126.

European Seminar 2017, Fighting Corruption – <https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/file_import/european-semester_thematic-factsheet_fight-against-corruption_bg.pdf> - (Access 27 January 2023).

Costa, S. (2013). Do Freedom of Information Laws Decrease Corruption? The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(6), 1317-1343.

Lagunes, P., Pocasangre, O. (2019). Dynamic transparency: An audit of Mexico's freedom of information act. Journal Public Administration, 97 (1), 162-176.

Schoch, F., Schneider, JP. & Bier, W. (2016). (Eds.). Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung. München: Verlag C. H. Beck. ISBN 9783406649677.

What is Administrative Data? <https://www.chapinhall.org/research/what-is-administrative-data> - (Access 22 January 2023).

Downloads

Published

2023-04-01

How to Cite

Svetli Marinova, I. (2023). Freedom of information laws and open government data as anti-corruption measures. International Science Journal of Jurisprudence & Philosophy, 2(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjjp.20230202.01

Issue

Section

Administrative Law, Administrative Procedure