Breaking with tradition: an analysis of post-totalitarian discourse in Ukrainian architecture and the search for a national style
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjea.20250404.03Keywords:
post-totalitarian discourse, socialist urbanism, standardized design, national identity, breaking with traditionAbstract
This article explores the impact of Soviet architectural policy on the “rupture of tradition” in Ukraine, viewed as a key factor behind the crisis of national identity in contemporary architecture. The relevance of the topic is underscored by an intensified need for cultural self-identification amidst full-scale war and the necessity of forming a theoretical foundation for future postwar reconstruction [1, 2]. The article highlights the risk of further loss of uniqueness due to the uncritical adoption of globalized styles and emphasizes the importance of engaging with Ukraine’s own heritage to shape a distinct architectural identity. A comprehensive comparative analysis is conducted on two key phases in the search for a national style in the 20th century. The phenomenon of Ukrainian modernism in the 1920s – early 1930s is examined as a powerful, though interrupted, attempt to restore Ukraine’s architectural agency through a synthesis of national principles and cutting-edge avant-garde ideas [3, 4]. The policies of socialist realism and subsequent stylistic unification are analyzed as tools for suppressing these efforts and institutionally dismantling the national architectural school [5, 6]. The architectural practices of the 1990s – 2000s are also investigated, characterized by stylistic fragmentation, retrospection, and eclecticism – manifestations of a post-traumatic condition [7, 8, 9]. The article argues that the stylistic fragmentation of contemporary Ukrainian architecture is a direct consequence of the historical trauma caused by the rupture of tradition. It stresses the necessity and possibility of overcoming this rupture by critically reinterpreting historical experience. Suggested paths toward the formation of a coherent modern national architecture involve not the direct replication of past forms, but the revival of the 1920s – 1930s methodological approach – a capacity for creative synthesis. The need for a systemic strategy to create a new style is emphasized, one that includes the development of a contemporary theoretical base and consideration of lessons from both historical stages. The article contributes to understanding the deep-seated causes of crisis phenomena in modern Ukrainian architecture and offers a conceptual framework for its future development rooted in a unique national heritage.References
Bellat, F. (2022). Erasing or restoring ukrainian heritage: From Stalin to Putin. DOCOMOMO Journal, (67), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.67.03
Rusanova, M., & Maimeskul, O. (2024). Modernist monuments of Freedom Square in Kharkiv. DOCOMOMO Journal, (70), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.70.05
Сапєлкіна, З. П. (2024). Модерне українське мистецтво: європейська тотожність чи окремість [Modern ukrainian art: European identity or separateness]. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв [Bulletin of the National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts], (1), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2024.302074
Liber, G. O. (1992). Soviet nationality policy, urban growth, and identity change in the Ukrainian SSR, 1923-1934. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511562914
Udovički-Selb, D. (2009). Between modernism and socialist realism: Soviet architectural culture under Stalin's revolution from above, 1928–1938. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 68(4), 467–495. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2009.68.4.467
Пучков, А. (2021). Українська академія архітектури: історія, набутки і втрати, сподівання й перспективи. До історії функціонування академії у 1945–2021 роках [Ukrainian academy of architecture: history, achievements and losses, hopes and prospects. To the history of the functioning of the academy in 1945–2021]. Містобудування та територіальне планування [Urban Planning and Territorial Planning], (78), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2021.78.7-30
Франків, Р. (2020). Пошук харизматичного образу в сакральній архітектурі Львова 1990-2000-х років [The search for a charismatic image in the sacred architecture of Lviv in the 1990s-2000s]. Вісник національного університету «Львівська Політехніка». Серія «Архітектура» [Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic National University. Architecture Series], 1(2), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.23939/SA2020.01.054
Janocha, M. (2023). Architektura cerkiewna na Ukrainie 1991–2022 [Church architecture in Ukraine 1991–2022]. Kultura Słowian. Rocznik Komisji Kultury Słowian PAU, 19, 155–171. https://doi.org/10.4467/25439561ksr.23.011.18988
Зосім, С., & Ніколаєнко, В. (2024). Аналіз вітчизняного практичного досвіду формування багатоквартирної житлової забудови 1991–2010 рр. на прикладі міста Полтави [Analysis of domestic practical experience in the formation of multi-apartment residential buildings 1991–2010 on the example of the city of Poltava]. Сучасні проблеми архітектури та містобудування [Modern Problems of Architecture and Urban Planning], (70), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2024.70.206-221
Zosim, S., Nikolaienko, V., & Nikolaienko, V. (2024). Preservation of national traditions of ukrainian architecture during the reconstruction of destroyed cities and villages in the post-war period. International journal of conservation science, 15(1), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.36868/ijcs.2024.si.18
Petrulis, V. (2007). Politika architektūroje: reiškinio prielaidos sovietmečio Lietuvoje [Politics in architecture: Preconditions of the phenomenon in Soviet Lithuania]. Darbai ir dienos, 48. https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-8769.48.5
Дида, І. (2022). Українські урбаністичні традиції: актуальність в умовах сучасних викликів [Ukrainian urban traditions: Relevance in the face of modern challenges]. Вісник Національного університету «Львівська політехніка». Серія: «Архітектура» [Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic National University. Architecture Series], 2(8), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.23939/sa2022.02.079
Smolenska, S. (2019). Avant-garde architecture and art of the 1920s–1930s in Ukraine and European modernism: Interpenetration methods. Architectus, 59(3), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.37190/ARC190302
Smolenska, S. (2024). Kharkiv in the 1920s-1930s as the capital of victorious modernism. DOCOMOMO Journal, (70), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.70.02
Смоленська, С. (2023). Харків 1930: українські переможці забутого конкурсу світового рівня [Kharkiv 1930: Ukrainian winners of a forgotten world-class competition]. Сучасні проблеми дослідження, збереження та реставрації історичних фортифікацій [Modern problems of research, preservation and restoration of historical fortifications], (18), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.23939/fortifications2023.18.084
Deriabina, O., Pominchuk, M., & Konoplova, O. (2024). Public buildings in the architecture of Ukrainian modernism. DOCOMOMO Journal, (70), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.70.06
Novoselchuk, N. (2022). National traditions in the architecture of Ukrainian modernism of the early 20th century. DOCOMOMO Journal, (67), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.67.07
Гнідець, Р., & Ясінський, М. (2021). Український архітектурний модерн у творчості Івана Левинського [Ukrainian architectural modernism in the work of Ivan Levynskyi]. Вісник Національного університету «Львівська політехніка». Серія: «Архітектура» [Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic National University. Architecture Series], 2(3), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.23939/sa2021.02.018
Bykov, A. (2022). Challenges of architectural archiving in Ukraine. DOCOMOMO Journal, (67), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.67.02
Pottgiesser, U., & Quist, W. (2024). Kharkiv modernism. DOCOMOMO Journal, (70), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.70.ed
Ясінський, М., Погранична, І., & Ступінцев, А. (2022). Етапи історико-архітектурного розвитку міста Дніпро в Україні [Stages of historical and architectural development of the city of Dnipro in Ukraine]. Теорія та практика дизайну: зб. наук. праць. Архітектура та будівництво [Theory and practice of design: collection of scientific works. Architecture and construction], (26), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8151.2022.26.15
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Stanislav Luzhnyi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.