Ethical human resource management in the context of globalization: digital transformation and the limits of monitoring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjmef.20260503.03Keywords:
digitalization, employee monitoring, management ethics, remote work, privacy, labor productivity, algorithmic management, personal autonomy, information securityAbstract
This article is devoted to the study of ethical aspects of implementing digital employee monitoring systems within contemporary organizational structures in the context of globalization and the widespread transition to remote forms of work. The paper analyzes the transformation of approaches to labor control, where traditional supervisory methods are being replaced by continuous electronic performance monitoring, algorithmic management, and artificial intelligence–based analytics. The object of the study is the processes of digital employee control, while the subject focuses on ethical risks and the possibilities for harmonizing the interests of employers and employees. The author provides a detailed examination of key challenges arising from excessive digital surveillance, including violations of privacy in the home environment, reduced employee autonomy, the emergence of algorithmic bias, and the growth of technostress, which leads to professional burnout and the simulation of productivity. The article proposes the concept of the Adaptive Ethical Gateway, which introduces a dynamic approach to control based on the level of trust and employee performance. This concept incorporates mechanisms of contextual privacy filtering and the right to short-term digital autonomy, enabling the transformation of monitoring from a repressive tool into an instrument of support and professional development. The study demonstrates that the effectiveness of modern human resource management is determined not only by the technological capabilities of monitoring systems but also by the level of their ethical compliance and transparency. The conclusions and recommendations emphasize the need to transition to partnership-based models of interaction, where data minimization and employee involvement in shaping monitoring policies become the foundation for the sustainable development of human capital in the digital era. The results of the study may be used by HR managers and organizational leaders to improve remote team management systems and strengthen corporate culture.References
Список літератури:
Aguboshim, F., Ezeife, J., & Ezeasomba, I. (2019). Monitoring IT and Internet Usage of Employees for Sustainable Economic Development in Nigeria: Legal and Ethical Issues. Journal of Information Engineering and Applications, 9(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.7176/jiea/9-5-03
Akter, S. (2025). AI’s Impact on Talent Acquisition Strategies and Employee Engagement Methodologies: Ethical Considerations for Trustworthy AI-HRM Integration. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 7(8). doi: https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2025.7.8.6
Alge, B. (2001). Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 797-804. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.797
Ball, K. (2010). Workplace surveillance: an overview. Labor History, 51(1), 106-187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00236561003654776
CleverControl. (2024). Monitorynh pratsivnykiv [Employee monitoring]. Available at: https://clevercontrol.com/uk/employee-monitoring/ (accessed April 10, 2026)
Do, K., De Los Santos, M., Muller, M., Savage, S. (2024). Designing Gig Worker Sousveillance Tools. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24), 1-19. doi: http://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642614
Evans, G., Kloke, H., & Jahn, S. (2023). Review of ethics for occupational hygiene hazard monitoring surveys using sensors. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 20(10), 439-451. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2023.2247018
Halbusi, H., Williams, K., Ramayah, T., Aldieri, L., & Vinci, C. (2020). Linking ethical leadership and ethical climate to employees' ethical behavior: the moderating role of person–organization fit. Personnel Review. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2019-0522
Jahagirdar, R., & Bankar, S. (2020). Employees Perception of Workplace Monitoring and Surveillance. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.61.474486
Jannat, T., Alam, S., Ho, Y., Omar, N., & Lin, C. (2021). Can Corporate Ethics Programs Reduce Unethical Behavior? Threat Appraisal or Coping Appraisal. Journal of Business Ethics, 176, 37-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04726-8
Jeske, D. (2022). Remote workers' experiences with electronic monitoring during Covid-19: implications and recommendations. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 15(3), 393-409. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-02-2021-0042
Jung, H., Fusi, F., Welch, E., Louafi, S., & Manzella, D. (2021). Apply with caution! The contingent effect of blockchain-enabled governance on trust. Research Handbook on E-Government. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786437259.00018
Kalischko, T., & Riedl, R. (2021). Electronic Performance Monitoring in the Digital Workplace: Conceptualization, Review of Effects and Moderators, and Future Research Opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 633031. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633031
Kalluri, N. (2025). The Impact of AI on Workplace Litigation: A Study of Employee Relations and Conflict Resolution. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 7(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i04.51880
Kerr, J., Naegelin, M., Benk, M., Wangenheim, F., Meins, E., Viganò, E., & Ferrario, A. (2022). Investigating Employees’ Concerns and Wishes Regarding Digital Stress Management Interventions With Value Sensitive Design: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/44131
Leicht-Deobald, U., Busch, T., Schank, C., Weibel, A., Schafheitle, S., Wildhaber, I., & Kasper, G. (2019). The Challenges of Algorithm-Based HR Decision-Making for Personal Integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 160, 377-392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04204-w
Mathur, M., Pramanik, B., Rosalyn, S., Thulaseedharan, A., Mirzani, Y., & Namdeo, S. (2024). Ethical Implications of AI in HRM: Balancing Efficiency and Privacy in Employee Monitoring Systems. Nanotechnology Perceptions. doi: https://doi.org/10.62441/nano-ntp.vi.3870
McParland, C., & Connolly, R. (2020). Dataveillance in the Workplace: Managing the Impact of Innovation. Business Systems Research Journal, 11(1), 106-124. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2020-0008
Shrivastav, P., Tiwari, D., & Lakshmi, G. (2025). Study of Employee Privacy Rights in the Digital Age. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(45). doi: https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i45s.9036
Sum, C. M., Shi, C., Fox, S. E. (2025). "It's Always a Losing Game": How Workers Understand and Resist Surveillance Technologies on the Job. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(CSCW004), 1-32. doi: http://doi.org/10.1145/3710902
Tursunbayeva, A., Pagliari, C., Di Lauro, S., & Antonelli, G. (2021). The ethics of people analytics: risks, opportunities and recommendations. Personnel Review. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-12-2019-0680
Vinith, K., & Pinto, D. (2023). Information Technology in Surveillance of Employee Performance. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics, Commerce and Educational Management. doi: https://doi.org/10.36713/epra14255
Vitak, J., & Zimmer, M. (2023). Power, Stress, and Uncertainty: Experiences with and Attitudes toward Workplace Surveillance During a Pandemic. Surveillance & Society, 21(1). 29-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v21i1.15571
Yaware. (2023). Monitorynh chasu: yak optymizuvaty robochu diialnist frylanseriv [Time monitoring: how to optimize the work activity of freelancers]. Available at: https://yaware.com.ua/uk/blog/monitoring-chasu-yak-optimizuvati-robochu-diyalnist-frilanseriv/ (accessed April 10, 2026)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Viktoriya Kharchuk, Nataliia Reverenda, Yevgeniy Telestakov, Marian Reverenda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




