Digital strategy of the critical infrastructure development: bibliometric and trend analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjmef.20240304.08Keywords:
national economy, critical infrastructure, digital transformation, digital development strategy, digital management strategy, bibliometric analysis, trend analysis, research clustersAbstract
At present, the problems of digital transformation of the economies of most European countries in the context of the implementation of the EU's digital strategy are gaining particular relevance. According to a study by analysts of the International Data Corporation, the total global spending on digital technologies is growing by 16.8% annually and amounted to 2.1 trillion dollars in 2019. Research by Huawei and Oxford Economics has shown that intelligent network interaction can fuel the growth of the digital economy, which will reach 23 trillion dollars by 2025. This increase will be 78.3% compared to 2017 (12.9 trillion dollars). By 2025, the share of the digital economy is planned to increase by 7.2 percentage points, or from 17.1 to 24.3% of global GDP. According to the calculations of The Boston Consulting Group experts, the volume of the digital economy by 2035 will amount to 16 trillion dollars. At the same time, digital technologies and information systems have a significant impact on the development of critical infrastructure as an important element of the national economy. Correctly selected digital technologies combined with the competencies of employees, processes and operations will allow critical infrastructure facilities to quickly adapt to crisis situations, use promising opportunities to modernize work processes, meet new and constantly changing customer needs, stimulate growth and implement innovative and management solutions. In view of this, the purpose of the article is to determine the contextual and temporal patterns of the development of the representation in the scientific literature of research in the field of digital transformation of critical infrastructure using bibliometric and trend analysis. A certain divergence of the trends of scientific and user interest in the issues of forming digital strategies for the development of critically important infrastructure facilities was noted. The formalization of the contextual features of the concept of "digital strategy for the development of critical infrastructure", identified based on the results of bibliometric analysis, made it possible to determine that the analysis of the impact of digitalization processes on the development of critical infrastructure, resistance to cyber threats, and the choice of a strategy for its transformation in the conditions of Industry 4.0 and 5.0 is becoming increasingly popular. Six clusters of scientific research devoted to the development of a digital strategy for the development of critical infrastructure have been identified. The first is focused on the formation of a system of cyber resilience and cybersecurity; the second – on the development of the smart city concept; the third – on the organization of the system of state policy and higher education; the fourth – on determining structural changes in the sphere of health care and education; the fifth – on the justification of the strategy for the development of the agro-industrial complex and the environmental protection sector due to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions; the sixth – on determining the temporal regularities of digitization processes for the effective development of critical infrastructure. The theoretical principles of identifying trends in scientific research for the justification of digital strategies for the development of critical infrastructure have been further developed, which, unlike the existing ones, are based on the results of structuring the existing research work (using the VOSviewer v. 1.6.19 and Google Trends tools) according to two criteria: the level of crowding of scientific research and the evolutionary-time dimension, which made it possible to cluster directions of interdisciplinary research. An abstract is a short summary of your research paper, usually about a paragraph (200-400 words) long. A well-written abstract can let readers get the essence of your paper, prepare readers to follow the detailed information, analyses, and arguments in your full paper, and help readers remember the key points.References
Trushkina, N. (2019). Development of the information economy under the conditions of global economic transformations: features, factors and prospects. Virtual Economics, 2(4), 7-25. doi.
Kryshtanovych, S., Prosovych, O., Panas, Y., Trushkina, N., Omelchenko, V. (2022). Features of the Socio-Economic Development of the Countries of the World under the influence of the Digital Economy and COVID-19. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(1), 9-14. doi: https;//doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.2.2.
Кизим, М. О., Хаустова, В. Є., Трушкіна, Н. В. (2022). Сутність поняття «критична інфраструктура» з позицій національної безпеки України. Бізнес Інформ, 12, 58-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-12-58-78.
Bezpartochnyi, M., Khaustova, V., Trushkina, N. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of the relationship between the concepts of “critical infrastructure” and “national security”. Management of socio-economic transformations of business processes: current realities, global challenges, forecast scenarios and development prospects: scientific monograph. Sofia: Professor Marin Drinov Publishing House of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 177-193. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10463183.
Khaustova, V., Kyzym, M., Trushkina, N., Khaustov, M. (2024). Digital transformation of energy infrastructure in the conditions of global changes: bibliometric analysis. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Applied Innovations in IT (Koethen, Germany, Match 7, 2024). Koethen: Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, 12(1), 135-142. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/115664.
Brynjolfsson, E., Kahin, B. (2000). Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dahlman, C., Mealy, S., Wermelinger, M. (2016). Harnessing the Digital Economy for Developing Countries. Paris: OECD. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/4adffb24-en.pdf.
Drozdz, W., Marszalek-Kawa, J., Miśkiewicz, R., Szczepanska-Waszczyna, K. (2020). Digital Economy in the Comporary World. Torun: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszalek.
Dzwigol, H., Dzwigol-Barosz, M., Miskiewicz, R., Kwilinski, A. (2020). Manager Competency Assessment Model in the Conditions of Industry 4.0. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4(5)), 2630-2644. doi: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(5).
Elmasry, T. et al. (2016). Digital Middle East: Transforming the Region into a Leading Digital Economy. New York: McKinsey & Company. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/middle-east-and-africa/digital-middle-east-transforming-the-region-into-a-leading-digital-economy.
Kwilinski, A. (2018). Mechanism of Formation of Industrial Enterprise Development Strategy in the Information Economy. Virtual Economics, 1(1), 7-25. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.34021/ve.2018.01.01(1).
Кwilinski, A. (2019). Implementation of Blockchain Technology in Accounting Sphere. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(SI2), 1-6.
Lane, N. (1999). Advancing the digital economy into the 21st century. Information Systems Frontiers, 1(3), 317-320.
Machlup, F. (2014). Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution and Economic Significance. Volume I. Knowledge and Knowledge Production. New Jersey: Princeton.
Miśkiewicz, R. (2019). Challenges Facing Management Practice in the Light of Industry 4.0: The Example of Poland. Virtual Economics, 2(2), 37-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2019.02.02(2).
Tapscott, D. (1996). The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tugui, A. (2015). Meta-Digital Accounting in the Context of Cloud Computing. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology. 3-rd ed. USA: IGI Global, 20-32.
Maglaras, L. A. et al. (2018). Cyber security of critical infrastructures. ICT Express, 4, 42-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2018.02.001.
Alcaide, J. I., Llave, R. G. (2020). Critical infrastructures cybersecurity and the maritime sector. Transportation Research Procedia, 45, 547-554. doi.
Markopoulou, D., Papakonstantinou, V. (2021). The regulatory framework for the protection of critical infrastructures against cyberthreats: Identifying shortcomings and addressing future challenges: The case of the health sector in particular. Computer Law & Security Review, 41, 105502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105502.
Alderson, D. L., Darken, R. P., Eisenberg, D.A., Seager, T. P. (2022). Surprise is inevitable: How do we train and prepare to make our critical infrastructure more resilient? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 72, 102800. doi: https://doi.org/.
Sanders, P., Bronk, C., Bazilian, M. (2022). Critical energy infrastructure and the evolution of cybersecurity. The Electricity Journal, 35(10), 107224. doi.
Argyroudis, S. A. et al. (2022). Digital technologies can enhance climate resilience of critical infrastructure. Climate Risk Management, 35, 100387. doi.
Gellings, C. W. (2003). The power delivery system of the future: A vital part of u.s. energy policy. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 23(3), 58-76. doi: https://doi/org/10.1080/10485230309509644.
Aouragh, M., Chakravartty, P. (2016). Infrastructures of empire: towards a critical geopolitics of media and information studies. Media, Culture and Society, 38(4), 559-575. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716643007.
Shaik, F., Abdullah, A., Klein, S. (2017). Digital transformation in oil & gas – Cyber security and approach to safeguard your business. World Petroleum Congress Proceedings. London: Energy Institute.
Roege, P. E. et al. (2017). Bridging the gap from cyber security to resilience. NATO Science for Peace and Security. Series C: Environmental Security, Part F1. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 383-414. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_14.
Krotz, F. (2017). Explaining the mediatisation approach. Javnost, 24(2), 103-118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1298556.
Anantharaman, Sridharan, M. R. (2018). Evolving an Industrial Digital Ecosystem: A Transformative Case of Leather Industry. ,, 38. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 247-272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7515-5_18.
Øvrelid, E., Bygstad, B. (2019). The role of discourse in transforming digital infrastructures. Journal of Information Technology, 34(3), 221-242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396219831994.
Imamura, F. et al. (2019). Recent occurrences of serious tsunami damage and the future challenges of tsunami disaster risk reduction. Progress in Disaster Science, 1, 100009. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100009.
Maglaras, L. et al. (2020). Cybersecurity in the Era of Digital Transformation: The case of Greece. International Conference on Internet of Things and Intelligent Applications, ITIA 2020. Piscataway, NJ, United States: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ITIA50152.2020.9312297.
Maglaras, L., Kantzavelou, I., Ferrag, M. A. (2021). Digital transformation and cybersecurity of critical infrastructures. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(18), 8357. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188357.
Fekete, A., Rhyner, J. (2020). Sustainable digital transformation of disaster risk-integrating new types of digital social vulnerability and interdependencies with critical infrastructure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22), 9324. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229324.
Oliveira, J. et al. (2020). Failure mode and effect analysis for cyber-physical systems. Future Internet, 12(11), 205. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12110205.
Hinings, B. et al. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.infoandorg.2018.02.004.
Li, K. et al. (2020). How should we understand the digital economy in Asia? Critical assessment and research agenda. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 441, 101004. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101004.
Lal, R. et al. (2021). Soils and sustainable development goals of the United Nations: An International Union of Soil Sciences perspective. Geoderma Regional, 25, e00398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00398.
Picon, A. (2015). Smart Cities: A Spatialised Intelligence. New York, United States: Wiley. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119075615.
Sohn, H.-G. et al. (2005). Monitoring crack changes in concrete structures. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20(1), 52-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00376.x.
O'Doherty, D. et al. (2018). Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education – An integrative review. BMC Medical Education, 18(17), 130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0.
Tralli, D. M. et al. (2005). Satellite remote sensing of earthquake, volcano, flood, landslide and coastal inundation hazards. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 59(4), 185-198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.02.002
Coppola, L. et al. (2019). Biobanking in health care: Evolution and future directions. Journal of Translational Medicine, 17(122), 172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1922-3.
Singh, H., Kathuria, A. (2021). Analyzing driver behavior under naturalistic driving conditions: A review. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 150, 105908. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105908.
Guo, Q., Zhong, J. (2022). The effect of urban innovation performance of smart city construction policies: Evaluate by using a multiple period difference-in-differences model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 122003. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122003.
Vasudevan, K. R., Ramachandaramurthy, V. K., Venugopal, G., Ekanayake, J. B., Tiong, S. K. (2021). Variable speed pumped hydro storage: A review of converters, controls and energy management strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110156.
Deakin, M., Reid, A. (2018). Smart cities: Under-gridding the sustainability of city-districts as energy efficient-low carbon zones. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 39-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.054.
Das, R. et al. (2015). Distribution Automation Strategies: Evolution of Technologies and the Business Case. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 6(4), 2166-2175, 7047929. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2014.2368393.
Katz, R., Koutroumpis, P., Callorda, F. M. (2014). Using a digitization index to measure the economic and social impact of digital agendas. Info, 16(1), 32-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/info-10-2013-0051.
Charles, R. G., Douglas, P., Dowling, M., Liversage, G., Davies, M. L. (2020). Towards Increased Recovery of Critical Raw Materials from WEEE – evaluation of CRMs at a component level and pre-processing methods for interface optimisation with recovery processes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104923. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104923.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nataliia Trushkina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
