Aesthetics of the architectural form of community centers - the appearance of multifunctional interior spaces

Authors

  • Angela Munteanu Department of Architecture /Faculty of Urbanism and Architecture, Technical University of Moldova, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4671-022X
  • Diana Andronovici Department of Architecture /Faculty of Urbanism and Architecture, Technical University of Moldova, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjea.20220105.02

Keywords:

Aesthetic arfitectonic forms, space architecture, multifunctional community center

Abstract

The article contains a theoretical study, which reflects the importance of the studied theme from the perspective of the education of a prosperous society of a successful city. The main aim is for the modern architecture of multifunctional and attractive centers from the point of view of the built aesthetic form, of multiple interior spaces where the members of a society will gather: children, young people, and the elderly, interiors that provide the needs and basic comfort of living, development of a developing society.

The study focuses on the conscious development of the aesthetic form of the building, followed by being designed with the whole community in mind for: youth, children, and the elderly, not just for a specific group. The paper pursues two directions for analysis. First, the multifunctional community complex provides a space for people to gather, to interact between generations. Where in the second place, the spaces must be filled with colors, provided with enough natural light, and furnished for various ages and activities, to encourage interaction between generations, where the old can teach the young, as well as the young, can teach the old. However, the author concludes that this project concept will improve the urban and rural community, through aesthetic architectural form, a variety of modes of educational interaction, and social and healthy relationships.

References

Pallasmaa J. (2015). The touch that touches: architecture and the senses [Editura Bucharest], 247 p.

Baumgarten A.G. (1750). Aesthetica (1750) [Publisher: Impune IC Kleyb], 413 p.

Draper P. (2004) Nikolaus Pevsner Reassessing British Art and Visual Culture since 1750, New Readings [Ashgate Publishing], ISBN 9780754635826, 246 p.

Botton de A. (2009). Architecture of happiness [Translation Ema Stere-București], 150 p.

Pallasmaa J. (2012). Understanding Architecture [Phaidon Publishing House], 235 p.

Neufert E. (1999). The architect's manual [A.G.I.R. Publishing House, Bucharest], 200 p.

Turchina T. G. (2015). The psychology of space [Chisinau Publishing House], 134 p.

Prudeanu D., Baciu P., Gheorghiu M. (1990). Architecture and systematization [Bucharest, Editura didactica and pedagogic], 127 p.

NCM C. (01.12:2018) Civil buildings. Public buildings and constructions, 15 p.

Eco U. (1999). Art and beauty in modern aesthetics [Bucharest: Meridiane Publishing House], 112 p.

Pallasmaa J. (2005). Eyes of the skin. Architecture and the Senses [John Wiley: New York], p. 15.

Shilin V. I. (2011). Architecture and psychology [Brief summary of the lectures. Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering], 66 p.

Gadamer G. (2000). The actuality of beauty [Iasi: Polirom Publishing House], 96 p.

Red G. N. (2005). Multifunctional architectural space [Publishing The universe, ”I. Mincu", Bucharest], 180 p.

Lisitsian M. V. (1980). Interior of public and residential buildings [Moscow, Izd-vo Stroyizdat], 100 p.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

How to Cite

Munteanu, A., & Andronovici, D. (2022). Aesthetics of the architectural form of community centers - the appearance of multifunctional interior spaces. International Science Journal of Engineering & Agriculture, 1(5), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjea.20220105.02