Current state, issues and perspectives of construction waste recycling in Ukraine

Authors

  • Milena Hudym Faculty of Architecture, Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Hanna Kononenko Faculty of Architecture, Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6102-0967
  • Yuriy Izbash Faculty of Construction, Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0936-0518

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjea.20220105.08

Keywords:

recycling, construction waste recycling, waste disposal, secondary raw materials, reuse, waste management, environmental safety, latest technologies, materials

Abstract

The article analyzes the problem of construction and demolition waste disposal in Ukraine, which is especially relevant due to the increasing number of housing renovation projects and the intensification of national construction projects. Construction waste accounts for almost a third of the waste generated in most developed countries. The most efficient disposal method is recycling, i.e. recycling of secondary building resources (SBR). However, the share of recycled construction waste in Ukraine lags far behind developed countries (it is about 6% of its total volume). The high level of waste generation and low rates of its use as secondary raw materials (SRM) have led to the fact that a significant amount of solid waste accumulates annually in the industrial and civil sectors of Ukraine, only a small part of which is used as SRM, the rest ends up in landfills. The difference between waste management in Ukraine, compared with other developed countries, is in the large volumes of waste generation and the lack of infrastructure to recycle it. The issues of the environmental impact of construction waste are considered, and the main cost-effective technologies for processing SBR are identified and considered in this research. With the help of market mechanisms and government regulations, these technologies may become promising for investment and their development will be beneficial for small and medium-sized businesses. Perspective areas of construction waste recycling in order to obtain demanded products are presented; existing advantages and technologies of processing SRM are also considered: solid waste processing, biothermal composting, wood waste processing, recycling of construction waste and metallurgical slag, etc.

References

Melen-Zabramna, O. (2018, November 12). 5 steps of waste management. 2 step: Reuse of waste. Environment People Law. http://epl.org.ua/environment/5-shodynok-upravlinnya-vidhodamy-2-shodynka-povtorne-vykorystannya-vidhodiv/

Golik, Y., Ilyash, O., & Bilous, M. (2017). Subregional solid waste management strategy for the Poltava region. Ecological safety, 1, 20–25.

Shyshkin, E., Gayko, Y., Vyatkin, K., & Chala, A. (2018). Urban development and territorial planning. Scientific and technical collection.

Reimann Dieter. O. (1991). Multifuktionale, zukunftsorientiertr Rauchgasrei nigungstechniken. Brennst.-Warme-Kraft, 3, 61–64.

Kondrashchenko, E., & Kachura, A. (2013). On the problem of cities on the use of construction waste from the demolition of buildings and structures. Municipal Economy of Cities, 107, 150–155.

Oleynik, P., & Oleynik, S. (2019). Organization of the system of construction waste processing and obtaining secondary resources. Vuzovskoe Obrazovanie, 193, 22-27.

Oleynyk, P., & Brodsky, V. (2013). Organization of construction waste recycling management. Bulletin of the Pridneprovskaya State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 20-28.

Oleynik, P. (2006). Unified system of construction waste recycling.

Pashkevich, M., Barkan, M., Sharykov, Y., Dashko, R., Movchan, I., Cheremysyna, O., Fomin, S., Berezovsky, P., Chirkst, D., Arsentyev, V., Mykhailova, N., Denysov, N., Baluev, R., & Karasev, Yu. (2010). Ecological problems of megacities and industrial agglomerations: Textbook. Allowance St. Petersburg State Mining Institute (Technical University). St. Petersburg, 202.

Sumskoi, S., & Levchenko, E. (2018). Ecologization of construction waste in Alchevsk. Materials of the 4th international scientific and practical conference. Volume 4. Prospective directions for the development of ecology and chemical technology. Donetsk, 107–110.

Kostetsky, N., & Lunev, H. (2003) The main problems of using secondary construction resources. Economics of construction, 2-15.

Oleynyk, P. (2005). Sources of construction waste generation and the concept of their processing. PGS, 36-37.

Palgunov, P. (1990). Utilization of industrial waste. Sumarokov. M.: Stroyizdat, 352.

Mykryukov, K., Abdullyn, I., Porkhachev, P., & Kochkin, R. (2013). The use of thermal compounds for the destruction of reinforced concrete structures. Bulletin of the Kazan Technological University, 85-87.

Chushev, V. (2004). The use of secondary waste of recycling plants in the production of building materials. Building materials, 45-46.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

How to Cite

Hudym, M., Kononenko, H., & Izbash, Y. (2022). Current state, issues and perspectives of construction waste recycling in Ukraine. International Science Journal of Engineering & Agriculture, 1(5), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjea.20220105.08